The crimes of Winston Churchill


England celebrates their genocides. The ‘Winston Churchill note’ has entered circulation. Honouring a man who swilled on champagne while 4 million men, women and children in Bengal starved due to his racist colonial policies.

The trial of Churchill:

Churchill was a genocidal maniac. He is fawned over in Britain and held up as a hero of the nation. He was voted ‘Greatest Briton’ of all time. Below is the real history of Churchill, the history of a white supremacist whose hatred for Indians led to four million starving to death, the man who loathed Irish people so much he conceived different ways to terrorise them, the racist thug who waged war on black people across Africa and in Britain. This is the trial of Winston Churchill, the enemy of all humanity.





Churchill found his love for war during the time he spent in Afghanistan. While there he said “all who resist will be killed without quarter” because the Pashtuns need “recognise the superiority of race”. He believed the Pashtuns needed to be dealt with, he would reminisce in his writings about how he partook in the burning villages and peoples homes:

“We proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive devastation.” – Churchill on how the British carried on in Afghanistan, and he was only too happy to be part of it.

Churchill would also write of how “every tribesman caught was speared or cut down at once”. Proud of the terror he helped inflict on the people of Afghanistan Churchill was well on the road to becoming a genocidal maniac.



The British Army under the guidance of Churchill perpetrated a massacre on the streets of Athens in the month of December 1944. 28 protesters were shot dead, a further 128 injured. The British demanded that all guerrilla groups should disarm on the 2nd December 1944. The following day 200,000 people took to the streets, and this is when the British Army under Churchill’s orders turned their guns on the people. Churchill regarded ELAS (Greek People’s Liberation Army) and EAM (National Liberation Front) as “miserable banditti”, these were the very people who ran the Nazis out. His actions in the month of December were purely out of his hatred and paranoia for communism.

The British backed the right-wing government in Greece returned from exile after the very same partisans of the resistance that Churchill ordered the murder of had driven out the Nazi occupiers. Soviet forces were well received in Greece, this deeply worried Churchill. He planned to restore the monarchy in Greece to combat any possible communist influence. The events in December were part of that strategy.

In 1945, Churchill sent Charles Wickham to Athens where he was in charge of training the Greek security police. Wickham learned his tricks of the trade in British occupied Ireland between 1922-1945 where he was a commander of the colonial RUC, responsible for countless terror.

In April 1945 Churchill said “the [Nazi] collaborators in Greece in many cases did the best they could to shelter the Greek population from German oppression” and went on to say “the Communists are the main foe”.



“I’d rather see them have a good civil war”. – Churchill wishing partition on India

Very few in Britain know about the genocide in Bengal let alone how Churchill engineered it. Churchill’s hatred for Indians led to four million starving to death during the Bengal ‘famine’ of 1943. “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion” he would say.

Bengal had a better than normal harvest during the British enforced famine. The British Army took millions of tons of rice from starving people to ship to the Middle East – where it wasn’t even needed. When the starving people of Bengal asked for food, Churchill said the ‘famine’ was their own fault “for breeding like rabbits”. The Viceroy of India said “Churchill’s attitude towards India and the famine is negligent, hostile and contemptuous”. Even right wing imperialist Leo Amery who was the British Secretary of State in India said he “didn’t see much difference between his [Churchill] outlook and Hitler’s”. Churchill refused all of the offers to send aid to Bengal, Canada offered 10,000 tons of rice, the U.S 100,000, he just point blank refused to allow it. Churchill was still swilling champaign while he caused four million men, women and children to starve to death in Bengal.

Throughout WW2 India was forced to ‘lend’ Britain money. Churchill moaned about “Indian money lenders” the whole time. The truth is Churchill never waged war against fascism. He went to war with Germany to defend the British Empire, he said this about India during WW2 “are we to incur hundreds of millions of debt for defending India only to be kicked out by the Indians afterwards”.

In 1945 Churchill said “the Hindus were race protected by their mere pullulation from the doom that is due”. The Bengal famine wasn’t enough for Churchill’s blood lust, he wished his favourite war criminal Arthur Harris could have bombed them.



“A prize from fairyland beyond our wildest dreams” – Churchill on Iran’s oil

When Britain seized Iran’s oil industry Churchill proclaimed it was “a prize from fairyland beyond our wildest dreams”. Churchill meddled in Iranian affairs for decades, he helped exclude Iranians from their natural resources and encouraged the looting when most lived in severe poverty.

In June 1914 Churchill proposed a bill in the House of Commons that would see the British government become become the major shareholder of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The company would go on to refrain from paying Iran its share of the dividends before paying tax to the British exchequer. Essentially the British were illegally taxing the Iranian government.

When the nationalist government of Mohammad Mosaddegh threatened British ‘interests’ in Iran, Churchill was there, ready to protect them at any cost. Even if that meant desecrating democracy. He helped organise a coup against Mosaddegh in August 1953.  He told the CIA operations officer that helped carry out the plan “if i had been but a few years younger, I would have loved nothing better than to have served under your command in this great venture”.

Churchill arranged for the BBC to send coded messages to let the Shah of Iran know that they were overthrowing the democratically elected government. Instead of the BBC ending their Persian language news broadcast with “it is now midnight in London” they under Churchill’s orders said “it is now exactly midnight”.

Churchill went on to privately describe the coup as “the finest operation since the end of the war [WW2]”. Being a proud product of imperialism he had no issue ousting Mosaddegh so Britain could get back to sapping the riches of Iran.



“I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilized tribes… it would spread a lively terror.” – Churchill on the use of gas in the Middle East and India

Churchill was appointed ‘Secretary of State for the Colonies’ in 1921 and he formed the ‘Middle East Department’ which was responsible for Iraq. Determined to have his beloved empire on the cheap he decided air power could replace ground troops. A strategy of bombing any resistance to British rule was now employed.

Several times in the 1920s various groups in the region now known as Iraq rose up against the British. The air force was then put into action, indiscriminately bombing civilian areas so to subdue the population.

Churchill was also an advocate for the use of mustard and poison gases. Whilst ‘Secretary for War and Air’ he advised that “the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs” should be used “for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes” in order to take control of Iraq.

When Iraqi tribes stood up for themselves, under the direction of Churchill the British unleashed terror on mud, stone and reed villages.

Churchill’s bombing of civilians in ‘Mesopotamia’ (Kurdistan and Iraq) was summed up by war criminal ‘Bomber Harris’:

“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means within 45 minutes a full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no effective means of escape”. – Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris



“We have always found the Irish a bit odd. They refuse to be English” – Churchill

In 1904 Churchill said “I remain of the opinion that a separate parliament for Ireland would be dangerous and impractical”. Churchill’s ancestry is linked to loyalism to Britain, he is a direct descendent of the ‘Marquis of Londonderry’ who helped put down the 1798 United Irishmen rising. He would live up to his families reputation when it came to suppressing revolutionary forces in Ireland.

The Black and Tans were the brainchild of Churchill, he sent the thugs to Ireland to terrorise at will. Attacking civilians and civilian property they done Churchill proud, rampaging across the country carrying out reprisals. He went on to describe them as “gallant and honourable officers”. It was also Churchill who conceived the idea of forming the Auxiliaries who carried out the Croke Park massacre, firing into the crowd at a Gaelic football match, killing 14. Of course this didn’t fulfill Churchill’s bloodlust to repress as people who he described as “odd” for their refusal “to be English”, he went on to advocate the use of air power in Ireland against Sinn Fein members in 1920. He suggested to his war advisers that aeroplanes should be dispatched with orders to use “machine-gun fire or bombs” to “scatter and stampede them”.

Churchill was an early advocate for the partitioning of Ireland. During the treaty negotiations he insisted on retaining navy bases in Ireland. In 1938 those bases were handed back to Ireland. However in 1939 Churchill proposed capturing Berehaven base by force. In 1941 Churchill supported a plan to introduce conscription in the North of Ireland.

Churchill went on to remark”the bloody Irish, what have they ever done for our wars”, reducing Ireland’s merit to what it might provide by way of resources (people) for their imperialist land grabs.



Britain declared a state of emergency in Kenya in 1952 to protect its system of institutionalised racism that they established throughout their colonies so to exploit the indigenous population. Churchill being your archetypical British supremacist believed that Kenya’s fertile highlands should be only for white colonial settlers. He approved the forcible removal of the local population, which he termed “blackamoors”.

150,000 men, women and children were forced into concentration camps. Children’s schools were shut by the British who branded them “training grounds for rebellion”. Rape, castration, cigarettes, electric shocks and fire all used by the British to torture the Kenyan people under Churchill’s watch.

In 1954 in a British cabinet meeting Churchill and his men discussed the forced labour of Kenyan POWs and how to circumvent the constraints of two treaties they were breaching:

“This course [detention without trial and forced labour] had been recommended despite the fact that it was thought to involve a technical breach of the Forced Labour Convention of 1930 and the Convention on Human Rights adopted by the Council of Europe”

The Cowan Plan advocated the use of force and sometimes death against Kenyan POWs who refused to work. Churchill schemed to allow this to continue.

Caroline Elkins book gives a glimpse into the extent that the crimes in Kenya were known in both official and unofficial circles in Britain and how Churchill brushed off the terror the colonial British forces inflicted on the native population. He even ‘punished’ Edwina Mountbatten for mentioning it, “Edwina Mountbatten was conversing about the emergency with India’s prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the then colonial secretary, Oliver Lyttleton. When Lyttleton commented on the “terrible savagery” of Mau Mau… Churchill retaliated, refusing to allow Lord Mountbatten to take his wife with him on an official visit to Turkey”.



“I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger.”

In 2012 Churchill was honoured with a statue in Jerusalem for his assistance to Zionism.

He regarded the Arab population Palestine to be a “lower manifestation”. And that the “dog in a manger has the final right to the manger”, by this he meant the Arabs of Palestine.


In 1920 Churchill declared “if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event will have occurred in the history of the world which would from every point of view be beneficial”.


A year later in Jerusalem he told Palestinian leaders that “it is manifestly right that the Jews, who are scattered all over the world, should have a national centre and a National Home where some of them may be reunited. And where else could that be but in this land of Palestine, with which for more than 3,000 years they have been intimately and profoundly associated?”.

At the Palestine Royal Commission (Peel) of 1937, Churchill stated that he believed in intention of the Balfour Declaration was to make Palestine an “overwhelmingly Jewish state”.

He went on to also express to the Peel Commission that he does “not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place”.

Four years later he wrote of his desire for a ‘Jewish state’to be established after the second war world. The establishment of the colonial settler state however was done on the watch of the British Labour Party under Attlee, who were always there to back their Tory counterparts when it came to British foreign policy.

Saudi Arabia:


“My admiration for him [Ibn Saud] was deep, because of his unfailing loyalty to us.” – Churchill


Prior to 1922 the British were paying Ibn Saud a subsidy of £60,000 a year. Churchill, then Colonial Secretary, raised it to £100,000.

He knew of the dangers of wahhabism, but was content to use the House of Saud’s twisted ideology for benefit of British imperialism. Just as the British had done a few years earlier when they teamed up with Al-Saud and their wahhabism to wage an internal war in the Ottoman Empire. He described Ibn Saud’s wahhabis as “intolerant, well-armed and bloodthirsty’. Of course, as long as they were on the side of the British, Winston was happy.

Churchill went on to write that his “admiration for him [Ibn Saud] was deep, because of his unfailing loyalty to us”.

Churchill meeting with Ibn Saud whom he showered with money and gifts. Britain foisted Wahhabism on the region. He gifted Ibn Saud a special Rolls-Royce in the mid 1940s.


South Africa:


Thousands were sent to British run concentration camps during the Boer wars. Churchill summed up his time in South Africa by saying “it was great fun galloping about”.

Churchill wrote that his only “irritation” during the Boer war was “that Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men”.

It was Churchill who planted the seed to strip voting rights from black people in South Africa. In June 1906, Churchill argued that Afrikaners should be allowed a self-rule which would mean black people would be excluded from voting.

He went on to state to Parliament that “we must be bound by the interpretation which the other party places on it and it is undoubted that the Boers would regard it as a breach of that treaty if the franchise were in the first instance extended to any persons who are not white”.

Other mentions:


‘British Guiana’: 

Churchill ordered the overthrowing of the democratically elected leader of ‘British Guiana’. He dispatched troops and warships and suspended their constitution all to put a stop to the governments nationalisation plan.


“I think we shall have to take the Chinese in hand and regulate them” – Churchill His hope from this was for “Ayran stock to triumph”…

Erich von Manstien:

Churchill donated funds for this Nazi war criminals defence when he was on trial after WW2.

Immigration to Britain: 

Churchill suggested the motto “Keep England White” when debating the adoption of new laws limiting immigration from the Caribbean.


Churchill extolled Mussolini – “If I were Italian, I am sure I would have been with you entirely from the beginning” and “what a man [Mussolini] ! I have lost my heart!… Fascism has rendered a service to the entire world”.

On his own people: 

Churchill suggested “100,000 degenerate Britons should be forcibly sterilised/others put in labour camps to halt decline of British race”. He also went on to suggest that “for tramps and wastrels there ought to be proper labour colonies where they could be sent”.


Churchill bragged that he personally shot at least three “savages” whilst there.

Robert Emmet (Irish Republican leader): 

Churchill plagiarised his famous “we shall fight on the beaches” from Emmet’s speech from the dock.


He urged the US to “wipe” out the Kremlin with an atomic bomb hoping it would “handle the balance of Russia”.

World War 1:

“I love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment”.

World War 2: 

Churchill’s cabinet during WW2 obsessed about British people viewing black GIs favourably.

65 thoughts on “The crimes of Winston Churchill”

      1. Very VERY few do, little is taught or available on the darker side of Churchill as not to tarnish of the “hero of WW2” 😦
        Much as little seems to be known of the Iran-Contra affair among US youth.
        It is very difficult to find open discussion of much of Churchills views and activities pre WW2 other than the knowledge of his “black dog” depressive episodes.
        It is wrong to assume “they know”.

        Liked by 4 people

      2. I can assure you that at the age of 51, I had absolutely no idea how awful this man was. In Scottish schools we only got history from an English point of view. Only recently found out how despicable he was to the Irish people, never mind how he was to those other countries mentioned in this piece.

        Liked by 3 people

  1. Makes you ashamed to be part of the world this mad bastard came from, although he had machine guns turned on my ancestors red cyldeside march in George Square Glasgow.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. What about his ‘collar the lot’ attitude to all the British Italians interned as ‘foreign aliens’ in WW2…….. Locking up old ice cream men who had spent most of their lives here and who had sons fighting for the British !
    Look up The SS Arandora Star sinking please.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Read: Churchill’s Sacrifice of the 51st Division – if he could abandon ‘our own’ Highland troops like this, in WW2, it’s not surprising what he did to other nationalities. My Father was one of them, left behind in France at the age of 17 – you could not mention Churchill’s, or Montgomery’s names in his hearing.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. You’d defend this murderous scum just because he is English?
      Then you should leave English soil, as you do not support the ideologies this country was built on.
      As home secretary he even killed British citizens demonstrating for jobs in the 1920’s.
      Hang your head in shame.

      Liked by 5 people

  4. Always HATED the name “Winston Churchill”, only for the fact he purposefully sent Australian and New Zealand troops to a suicide mission, and, I believe ‘purposely’ because he did not want to help our greatest allies, the Russians. All this other stuff fits the character alright. When we read this we can understand better all the misery and chaos going on today – thanks a lot to this maniac Churchill who set up so much of the evil.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. He sent the cavalry through the valleys, clubbing the miners’ wives and children from horseback, killing, maiming and severely injuring, so as to break the miners’ resolve. Those that still remember, or have heard from older generations, damn his accursed name and spit on the ground if we hear it spoken.

      Liked by 7 people

  5. He fought the war like an iron man in full confidence to win it along with his allied powers and it happened. If there were no Churchill we would have not free world and even no balance of power that UNO could manned for 70 years with USSR. It would be Nazi even swallowing Mussolini
    and even Japan…and the world would be just “hail Hitler”. Winston Churchill said “we will never surrenders” and he proved his worth for this great aim. In Iran and Potsdam conference he step by step steer the participants and hard to achieve was influences zone with USSR in East Europe. It was a great worth and transcendental political and war-front diplomacy that could settled down the world into two possible blocks so that issues be resolved peacefully in future without going to war…It happened as we saw the volunteer dissolution of USSR dawning a new world order which is yet to define itself. The low IQ world has indulged converted to Muslim faith so the replace USSR with Muslim fundamentalism but Churchill commitment will lead prudence to foil the ancient ‘fight to conquer’ religions…The sorrowful pictures of staving people recalls us the plight of Bengal in India which used to be one signal province then was divided in East Bengal and West Bengal again got united but to split once more whereafter East Bengal went to Pakistan and West Bengal to India and East Bengal is now Bangla Desh…Churchill has nothing to contribute to its save the people of Bengal were suffering for hailing from Urbanized west and rural East and both were reluctant to pay taxes which brought a plight unique in History…The Church and British Raj contributed to provide relief by amending laws etc which proved successful soon.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. you are, I am afraid, sadly mistaken like millions of brainwashed British and white commonwealth population in believing the myth that Churchill was the saviour of the western civilisation. Nothing is farther from the truth. Actually, If you read history with an open mind you would find that Hitler was not defeated by Allied powers but by USSR or rather by committing a monumental blunder of invading USSR during the middle of the war. The best equipped and trained and a substantially larger portion of the German army was deployed on Russian front. Do you know that the casualties suffered by USSR in defeating Germany was more than twenty times that suffered by the Allies.

      Liked by 4 people

  6. My father told me that Churchill was loudly booed when he appeared on the news segments in cinema’s in mining areas during the war because of his attitude to miners. Even suggesting flooding the mines with the men in them in Wales.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Churchill was a big supporter of the Eugenics movement, who’s aim was to rid society of “useless people” who supposedly are a burden and a plague on the strength of humanity.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. I am simply amazed. As a war-time child who followed closely with interest the events of W.W.2 I have been an admirer of Churchill as long as I can remember.
    At 9 years old I could not understand how an “ungrateful” British public could have ousted him in favour of what I considered a ‘wet’ Clement Attlee. What I did not know until TODAY was the lifetime history of what in my naivety I had always considered ‘ a great man’. Yes, he may well have been the best Prime Minister to have lead us to victory over Nazi Germany, and Japan, but what a shameful record he appears to have have had before and after. I am now inclined to accept the evidence I have just read, with just the minimal reservation that there is such a thing as propoganda.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. The late great Welsh actor Ray Smith used to say about their visits to the cinema in Nelson South Wales as children just after the war, that their parents used to give them oranges to eat during the interludes, but to make sure to keep the peel, so that they could chuck them at the screen whenever Churchill would appear on Pathé News on the screen.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. I had a totally different impression of Churchill from my skewed reading of history. I WAS NOT GIVEN THE TRUE FACTS. if what is written is true, he was truly a white supremacist.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. I had a totally different impression of Churchill from my skewed reading of history. I WAS NOT GIVEN THE TRUE FACTS. if what is written is true, he was truly a white supremacist.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. I don’t know why, but I have always had an opinion of Churchill, very close to what I have now learned reading these revelations. A despicable man, an embarrassment to mankind. And the sad reality is that the “Establishment” keep on deceiving the people, all of which makes “It” even more despicable. And all for what? A self serving ideology, corrupt and corrupting, which regards sheer greed as a virtue. I fail to understand what the establishment finds so wrong with socialism, let’s say Scandinavian style, It is the only ideology which makes you feel that we really are all in this together. If Jesus were to come, who knows HE may well come suddenly any time, He would probably eject the money lenders from our presence, like He did once. Personally, being an agnostic, don’t believe it will happen, but it is a nice thought.

    Liked by 5 people

  13. His identity was rotten to the core: A British “Nobleman” representing the Marlbroough line of descent from Veentian oligarchs who took over England with William of Orange. They were known as “The Venetian Partty”k. I wouldn;’t be surprised to find out is he were related to Caligula, Nero, and … Dracula…

    Liked by 3 people

  14. the man was a complete horses arse, what he did to the various areas in South Wales was despicable. He should have been hanged for treason for those alone without taking into consideration what he perpetuated throughout the rest of Britain and Ireland, leave alone his crimes against the rest of the World. He held back civilisation and technological advancement for his own ego to the detriment of millions of people.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Yes, he was a swine. But when this country needed defending in WW11, he was the man for the job. I’m not sure this tiny island would have survived without his leadership. All we can do now is make sure history doesn’t repeat itself


  16. I can assure you that at the age of 51, I had absolutely no idea how awful this man was. In Scottish schools we only got history from an English point of view. Only recently found out how despicable he was to the Irish people, never mind how he was to those other countries mentioned in this piece.

    Liked by 3 people

  17. David Irving’s biographical history ‘Churchills War’ is a supurb expose of this monster.Be sceptical about the libel trial,held without Jury (on a matter of public reputation) and in which millions of dollars were spent by his enemies. against a stuborn,proud
    Englishman. Up to that point he ,an amateur historian,was considered foremost in the field of II W.W. study by many.Please look into this open-mindedly.


  18. Some of this I knew albeit only recently. I’m not shocked to read the rest, he was a sub human and should have been hung. But his bloodline is safe and he was doing the work of his puppet masters.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Yeah, he was a megalomaniac who gloried in supposed “British superiority” and the blood shed trying to prove it.

    I cannot forget the abandoning of the 51st Division at St Valery. They were surrounded in the rear, facing the full force of the German army. Put in the rearguard to hold the Germans long enough to allow ” The miracle of Dunkirk” to happen. ( Something Churchill avoided speaking about)

    My father was captured there at 16 years old,( Joined up at 15 when he lied about his age)when they had to surrender due to lack of ammunition. He was fortunate as he escaped after capture on his own, what followed was many adventures across Vichy France, he was captured and escaped 12 times, the war ended for him when he was interned in Rabbat, Morocco by allied troops moving up North Africa.
    The only reason he did not try and escape Rabbat was simply that it was easy for him, prisoners were fed reasonable and allowed out at weekends!

    He ended up a interpreter in France for US forces, he had by then learned fluent French.
    He got the Military Medal from the king at Buckingham palace, the King said to him ” You are the chap who escaped 11 times” To which my father replied ” no, 12 times sir”

    It was all over by the time he was 20 years old. He was in many Newspapers of the time one calling him ” The man no prison camp could hold” He considered himself very lucky as most of the 51st was shipped to Germany to work and very many, never seen again.


  20. Churchill was a war criminal who began civilian bombing in both world wars. The Blitz happened because the RAF had already firebombed German cities since 10 May 1940. I don’t know why right-wing Britons praise him when he destroyed the UK as a world power, and signed away the British Empire in the Atlantic Charter. He should have been tried for war crimes.


  21. He truly was an evil man as my father spent 30 days in the glasshouse for not taking his cap off when he visited the ship he was serving on this was due in the 1926 strike his mother who went to help her sister in Fife .They were on their way with approx 300 women and children to give miners who were locked in the pit flasks of tea and food , but were set upon by 50 thugs with pick axe handles paid for by Churchill for his cronies who owned the mine,……. Nice one you fat drunk bastard hope your roasting with hitler Stalin and the Black and Tans .The scots Irish and Welsh will never forget .

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Also, he was first lord of the admiralty during WW1 when the Lusitania was sunk by German U Boat. There is some evidence, Churchill knew of the whereabouts and location of the sub but gave orders not to advise the captain of the subs location, in an effort to encourage the USA into the war.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Churchill deliberately had RMS Lusitania loaded with war munitions and coal so it would burn faster. All passenger liners were carrying war munitions in violation of the Geneva Convention.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s